Housing affordability is complicating recruitment in Spain’s tourism hotspots, putting staff accommodation on the agenda for hotel operators, owners and investors.
For hotels recruiting seasonal employees in Spain, an attractive job offer may not be enough. Candidates also need somewhere affordable to live.
Discover B2B Marketing That Performs
Combine business intelligence and editorial excellence to reach engaged professionals across 36 leading media platforms.
Meliá Hotels International demonstrated the challenge in March 2025, when Reuters reported that the group had bought a former hostel on Menorca, in Spain’s Balearic Islands, to accommodate seasonal staff. Chief executive Gabriel Escarrer said good pay alone was no longer sufficient to retain employees. The company had also housed workers in hotel rooms. Reuters report
The response illustrates an operational question for hotels in expensive tourism destinations: when does access to housing become part of the cost of running a property?
Buying accommodation requires capital and creates responsibilities beyond recruitment. Leasing properties, providing housing allowances and supporting employee transport involve different costs and commitments. Choosing between them means understanding both the local housing market and the reasons employees struggle to take or remain in a job.
Strong trading, different workforce pressures
Spain’s hotel sector continues to record strong trading figures.
Provisional data from Spain’s National Statistics Institute (INE) show that hotel overnight stays increased by 1.4% year on year in August 2026. Hotels charged an average of €166.90 per occupied room, up 7.3%, while revenue per available room (RevPAR) rose by 7.0% to €133.10.
The Balearic Islands illustrate the intensity of summer demand. Hotel bed-place occupancy reached 90.3% in August, the highest among Spain’s regions, while the Palma-Calvià tourist area recorded 91.5%. These figures measure occupied bed-places rather than rooms.
Strong trading figures do not establish the extent of housing-related labour shortages. They do, however, provide the backdrop to recruitment decisions in destinations where hotels depend on employees relocating for the season.
Those workers need accommodation for a limited period, potentially making a conventional long-term tenancy impractical. If suitable housing is unavailable, too expensive or beyond a workable commuting distance, a position may be difficult to accept.
Urban hotels face a different version of the same question. Their employees may need housing throughout the year, with affordability and journey times influencing where they can work.
For managers, identifying the principal obstacle matters. Recruitment difficulties may reflect housing costs, pay, working conditions, transport or a combination of factors. Investing in staff accommodation will only address the problem if access to housing is a significant part of it.
Who pays for staff accommodation?
Owning accommodation gives an operator greater control over availability. It also ties up capital and brings maintenance, management and operating costs. In a seasonal market, the budget must account for months when beds may be unused.
Leasing can reduce the initial capital commitment but exposes the business to rental increases and renewal risk. A housing allowance gives employees more choice, although extra money cannot guarantee that suitable accommodation exists.
Transport support may widen the recruitment area by allowing employees to live farther from the hotel. Its usefulness depends on journey times and whether services accommodate early starts, late finishes and split shifts.
The appropriate response depends on local housing supply, the number of employees affected, contract lengths and the economics of the property. An operator recruiting a large seasonal workforce has different requirements from a city hotel seeking to retain a smaller number of permanent employees.
Scale matters too. A large group may have the resources to acquire or lease a building, while an independent hotel may need to explore arrangements with landlords or accommodation providers. Meliá’s example demonstrates one employer’s response, rather than a model that every hotel can adopt.
Where hotel ownership and management are separate, responsibility for funding and administering staff accommodation also needs to be clear. The cost may ultimately be borne by the owner, the operating business, employees or a combination of the three.
Employee terms shape the benefit
The value of staff accommodation depends on its terms as well as its availability.
Employees need clear information about charges, shared rooms, facilities, transport and whether participation is optional. They also need to understand what happens to their accommodation when employment ends.
Housing linked to a job can make relocation possible, but it also makes a worker’s employment and living arrangements interdependent. The terms therefore deserve attention alongside the property’s capacity and cost.
Operators should assess whether accommodation changes recruitment and retention outcomes. Useful measures include accommodation cost per resident, take-up, offer acceptance, staff turnover and the proportion of seasonal employees who return.
These measures need context. An improvement in retention may also reflect higher pay, better schedules or changes in management. Recording why candidates decline offers and why employees leave can help establish whether housing provision is making a difference.
Rental regulation offers no automatic solution
Short-term tourist rentals are part of Spain’s wider housing debate. However, tighter controls do not necessarily translate into affordable homes for hotel employees.
The national regulatory framework has also changed. In a judgment dated 19 May 2026, Spain’s Supreme Court annulled provisions of the national short-term rental regime covering the single rental-registration procedure and the requirement for a registration number obtained through the Property Registry or Registry of Movable Assets in order to offer short-term accommodation through online platforms. The judgment did not annul the entire decree.
For workforce planning, policy changes and housing availability remain separate questions. A property leaving the tourist-rental market may be sold, used by its owner or offered at a rent beyond an employee’s budget. Location, condition and other demand will influence its next use.
Hotels considering leases or conversions should assess the rules applying to the specific property and its intended use. Staffing plans should not depend on an assumed increase in affordable housing supply following restrictions on tourist accommodation.
Put housing into investment due diligence
Housing access also warrants attention when buying, developing or repositioning a hotel.
Colliers recorded €2.46 billion of hotel investment in Spain during the first half of 2026, up 26.5% year on year. Resort assets accounted for 60% of the total, while the Balearic Islands attracted €577 million, or 23% of national investment.
The figures measure transaction activity rather than new rooms or jobs, but they underline the amount of capital being committed to Spanish hotel markets, particularly resorts.
For buyers and developers, workforce due diligence can examine where employees live, how they reach the property and whether the operating plan depends on recruiting from outside the destination.
Where accommodation is likely to be necessary, its cost, availability and delivery timetable should form part of the assessment before opening, expanding or repositioning a property.
Existing hotels can begin with their recruitment and employee-exit data. If housing repeatedly emerges as a reason for declined offers or departures, managers have a basis for comparing accommodation provision with alternatives such as transport support, pay or changes to working arrangements.
A workforce issue as well as a housing issue
Spain’s housing pressures cannot be resolved by individual hotel businesses. Housing supply, planning policy, rental regulation, tourism management and transport all influence the ability of workers to live near employment centres.
Hotels can, however, account for the consequences where those pressures affect their operations.
For some properties, that may mean providing accommodation directly. For others, leasing, housing allowances, transport support or partnerships with local accommodation providers may be more practical.
The important shift is to treat access to housing as part of workforce planning where local conditions make it relevant.
For hotel owners and operators, the lesson is straightforward: a destination that attracts guests must also be somewhere employees can afford to live.
